When I
meditate, I drift between two places. One is being somewhere else, like engaged
in a fantasy of some sort, developing a project to do, or worrying that someone
just stole a wallet from the zendo's shoe rack. Or I watch my breathing. But I
sense my Zen practice could be something else. I separate my mind from my body
from my breathing and become a trinity of three desperate elements. I'm
exhausted just at the thought of it. I'm discombobulated. Totally
discombobulated.
Sunday,
in preparation for my Tao study class, I mistakenly read the wrong passage. It
was about how a tiger, viewing his prey, has a choice of two actions. One is to
leap to devour the prey, and the second is to do nothing. I loved that in the
Tao world (actually our world) not acting is an action.
Then I
was searching on the Web for the Heart Sutra today to send a prisoner. Lo and
behold, the version I came across used the word void for emptiness. How
nice I thought! My walking partner reminds me that before things there really was
nothing. Space was not a container without contents. It wasn't. No outside. No
inside. Nada.
So I've
been trying to not busy myself with watching myself breathe—separating the breather, the
breath, and the watcher—but rather I'm trying to do none of that. And not to pursue
the alternative—drifting
off into lala land. Hovering between being present and being vigilance is hard
work—work
that qualifies under the auspices of the protestation work ethic. No, I want to
do something else. A while back we called it “be here now,” though at that moment when we
observe ourselves being here now, we aren't here, but rather observing
ourselves being there.
2 comments:
You may have reached a state of perfect wisdom. On the other hand you may not have reached this aspiration. H.
Void is generally considered to be a poor choice as a translation for emptiness. Emptiness does not refer to a state before things-as-it-is. It may be hinting at things-as-it-is not being the things-we-think-they-is. Or, put another way, emptiness is not nothingness, but no-thing-ness.
Post a Comment